Re: [picocontainer-dev] patches for *full* binding-annotation capability

> In this case, Konstantin has a potentially large
> change to merge  
> back.  If I applied my change to trunk first, it
> will be quite hard  
> for him.  He already has a moderate risk of
> not-completing his goal,  
> it'll be worse if I go off in a divergent direction
> on trunk.
> If Konstantin is as respectful (he's a 'good egg')
> he'll take a look  
> at the patch and suggest that its mergeable after
> his change, or  
> before it, or accomotate the same changes in his
> branch (chasing the  
> JasonsTestCase 'specification')

well, merge will be not smooth and easy - because your
patch also tangles parameter stuff ( which is under
heavy refactoring now )  - but possible. 

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email