Re: [picocontainer-dev] ComponentMonitor shouldn't be Generic?

Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Rimov wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Getting my first stabs at Pico 2 and after poking around, I was thinking that
> ComponentMonitor should not have a generic parameter associated with its type.
> [ie: ComponentMonitor {}, not ComponentMonitor<T> {} ]
> 
> The reason?  Because Component monitor receives notifications for all types
> registered with a PicoContainer, not just a single type.  Therefore, the methods
> that receive notification from the callback gain nothing from being attached to
> a generic type.
> 
> Any objections to reverting it to a non-generic type?
> 

Nope - agree with you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.