[picocontainer-dev] Default XML for Nano 2?

Hi guys,

I seem to recall a conversation with Mauro a while back that said that the
default XML container builder might be better off using XStream container
builder as the default....

I wanted to ask.... is that something that you guys plan on doing for Nano 2?
(I don't normally use the XML Container Builder, but while testing, I noticed
some behavior differences between the groovy container builder and the XML
container builder and wanted to know what the plans were for XML Container
Builder before I dove into it.)

Thanks!

								-Mike



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email