Re: [picocontainer-dev] Default XML for Nano 2?

Konstantin Priblouda wrote:

> 
> --- Michael Rimov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> I seem to recall a conversation with Mauro a while
>> back that said that the
>> default XML container builder might be better off
>> using XStream container
>> builder as the default....
> 
> basically xstream comes only to play when we define
> constants - so technically those builders are mostly
> the same.
> 
>> I wanted to ask.... is that something that you guys
>> plan on doing for Nano 2?
>> (I don't normally use the XML Container Builder, but
>> while testing, I noticed
>> some behavior differences between the groovy
>> container builder and the XML
>> container builder and wanted to know what the plans
>> were for XML Container
>> Builder before I dove into it.)
> 
> it's very diffucult to offer the same flexibility
> with xml, as with groovy, without makin syntax really
> awfull - so sometimes I myself have to fallback to
> groovy configuration ( for example, I have need for
> just certain object to be hotswappable - currently
> there is no sane way to  define such behaviour.

It is - with the non-XStream XML Container. Simply define a adapter factory
(at least this was possible in 1.x).

> and as we also have jndi exposing / jndi references,
> as well as dependencies on  jndi / jmx stored params
> ( done via parameters )  syntax definitely needs
> expansion.

Worked the same as above.
 
> Maybe we can borrow some ideas  from xwork
> configuration...

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email