Re: [picocontainer-dev] Is there higher wisdom in that AbstractPicoContainerTestCase
Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > --- Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rev 4132 of >> > https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/pico >> works fine on my end. >> >> Which build is broken for you? > > current nanocontainer trunk > Reverted AbstractPicoContainerTestCase to extend JUnit 3.x TestCase for backward compat. Will create new TCK classes for JUnit 4 use. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email