Re: [picocontainer-dev] Is there higher wisdom in that AbstractPicoContainerTestCase
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mauro is an eclipse user and is not in the habit of seeing the whole of pico/nano set of modules in the IDE at the same time. He'll get round to nano sooner or later ;-) I think we should be grateful though as its seriously tedious work :-) - Paul On Jan 3, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > > --- Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rev 4132 of >> > https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/pico >> works fine on my end. >> >> Which build is broken for you? > > current nanocontainer trunk > > ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- > JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email