Re: [picocontainer-dev] PicoContainer unit tests conversion

Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mauro Talevi wrote:
> Mauro Talevi wrote:
> 
>> org.picocontainer.tck -> these have been kept for backward compat.  I 
>> would like to sound out opinions as to what to do.  I would be in 
>> favour of not keeping support for JMock 1 in Pico 2.x, and providing a 
>> migration path.  It's often as easy as upgrading dependency and adding 
>> static imports to org.junit.Assert.*.
>>
> 
> I've also started conversion of Nano unit tests too.
> 
> 
> The dependency on AbstractPicoContainerTestCase has been removed and 
> replaced with that on AbstractPicoContainerTest (which does not extend 
> MockObjectTestCase nor TestCase).
> 
> The conversion is substantially simpler than that of the Pico tests, so 
> should not take long.
> 

Conversion competed for

https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/nano

I've removed any dependency on jmock 1.x in Nano tests.

Any thoughts on the issue of maintaining or not jmock 1.x support in Pico?

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.