Re: [picocontainer-dev] PicoContainer unit tests conversion
Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mauro Talevi wrote:
> Mauro Talevi wrote:
>
>> org.picocontainer.tck -> these have been kept for backward compat. I
>> would like to sound out opinions as to what to do. I would be in
>> favour of not keeping support for JMock 1 in Pico 2.x, and providing a
>> migration path. It's often as easy as upgrading dependency and adding
>> static imports to org.junit.Assert.*.
>>
>
> I've also started conversion of Nano unit tests too.
>
>
> The dependency on AbstractPicoContainerTestCase has been removed and
> replaced with that on AbstractPicoContainerTest (which does not extend
> MockObjectTestCase nor TestCase).
>
> The conversion is substantially simpler than that of the Pico tests, so
> should not take long.
>
Conversion competed for
https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/2.x/trunk/nano
I've removed any dependency on jmock 1.x in Nano tests.
Any thoughts on the issue of maintaining or not jmock 1.x support in Pico?
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email