Re: [picocontainer-dev] PicoContainer unit tests conversion

Michael Rimov wrote:
> 
>>> I've removed any dependency on jmock 1.x in Nano tests.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on the issue of maintaining or not jmock 1.x support in
>>> Pico?
>>>
>> Yeah, JMock2 is great.  Great work so far, and go for it :-)
> 
> Yeah, at this point, I concur -- especially on the great work.  I've done
> conversions like that, and I completely agree with Paul that what  you've done
> is monotonous at best.   Thanks!
> 

Eh eh, well ... what better pass time for the holidays :-)

Anyway, both Pico and Nano 2.x are not jmock 1.x free!  I've deployed 
snapshots for all.

Now tackling the nanoextras ... I'm on a roll - help, somebody stop me ;-)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email