Re: [picocontainer-dev] FactoryAdapter patch
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Oh sorry, didn't see this before the commit Jörg - I'll answer shortly.
- Paul
On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Hammant wrote:
>> A patch for the things being discussed on the user list.
>>
>> 1) a new ComponentAdapter (FactoryAdapter) attached
>>
>> 2) new method on CA, with its one-arg ancestor being deprecated
>>
>> T getComponentInstance(PicoContainer container, Class into)
>> throws PicoCompositionException;
>>
>> 3) a ton of smaller changes to reflect the new method
>>
>> 4) not supplied are the changes to nano/ etc.
>
> IMHO it is a bit scary that this means a changbe in the method
> signature of the Pico interface and will affect nearly every
> application build with Pico. What do we really gain? Why not take
> the proposed Logging/LogEnabled approach?
>
> - Jörg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email