[picocontainer-dev] Move nanoweb and aop to sandbox?
Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chatting to Paul, we feel these are not ready to be released.
- nanoweb: too immature and now completely superseded by new-generation
lightweight frameworks of similar philosophy (eg Waffle)
- aop: dependent on dynaop which has no 1.0 release and no active
development. Also, not really strictly script-related so it could have
it's own release cycle as standalone or be added to pico core/gems.
Proposal is to move them to sandbox.
The dynaop dependency could replaced by some other actively maintained
aspecting library, eg aspectj. I personally don't use aspects so not
really motivated to do that, but perhaps the usecase will come up in the
future.
Thoughts?
Cheers
PS: Note that I've done some spring cleaning in trunk. Moved nano* to
sandbox (the nanoextras as separate modules) - now that the refactored
and rebranded versions are in trunk. I've added micro for good measure
and historical integrity :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email