[picocontainer-dev] Move nanoweb and aop to sandbox?

Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Chatting to Paul, we feel these are not ready to be released.

- nanoweb: too immature and now completely superseded by new-generation 
lightweight frameworks of similar philosophy (eg Waffle)

- aop: dependent on dynaop which has no 1.0 release and no active 
development.   Also, not really strictly script-related so it could have 
it's own release cycle as standalone or be added to pico core/gems.

Proposal is to move them to sandbox.

The dynaop dependency could replaced by some other actively maintained 
aspecting library, eg aspectj.  I personally don't use aspects so not 
really motivated to do that, but perhaps the usecase will come up in the 
  future.

Thoughts?

Cheers

PS:  Note that I've done some spring cleaning in trunk.  Moved nano* to 
sandbox (the nanoextras as separate modules) - now that the refactored 
and rebranded versions are in trunk.  I've added micro for good measure 
and historical integrity :-)





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.