RE: [picocontainer-dev] Back compat ?

"Michael Rimov" <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:25:20 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Organization Centerline Computers, Inc
Message-ID <012c01c8d029$c9098520$5b1c8f60$@com>
> If we're renaming classes, should we deprecate or delete the old class
> name ?
> 
>    D    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
> CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer.java
>    A    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
> CommandLinePicoContainer.java

Good question.  Is there anybody actually using the CommandLinePico right now,
or is it serving more as an example of operation?

If the former, then I'll definitely put a deprecated stub there, if latter, then
I'm all for just deleting the old class. 

For some reason, I had it in my head that CommandLinePico hadn't really been
"released" yet, but... geeee DUH, I think it's been there for what, 4 versions
now?  :)

							-Mike


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email