Re: [picocontainer-dev] Back compat ?

Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:28:14 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Rimov wrote:
>> If we're renaming classes, should we deprecate or delete the old class
>> name ?
>>
>>    D    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
>> CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer.java
>>    A    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
>> CommandLinePicoContainer.java
> 
> Good question.  Is there anybody actually using the CommandLinePico right now,
> or is it serving more as an example of operation?
> 
> If the former, then I'll definitely put a deprecated stub there, if latter, then
> I'm all for just deleting the old class. 

I agree - let's see if deprecation is necessary.  Being the fix a simple 
rename, I would opt for a simple note in the release notes.  But not 
against deprecation if you prefer.

Cheers





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email