Re: [picocontainer-dev] Back compat ?

I'd prefer to put in a deprecated subclass with the old name.  I'm in  
agreement with the new name of course.

- Paul

On Jun 17, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Mauro Talevi wrote:

> Michael Rimov wrote:
>>> If we're renaming classes, should we deprecate or delete the old  
>>> class
>>> name ?
>>>
>>>   D    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
>>> CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer.java
>>>   A    pico/container/src/java/org/picocontainer/containers/
>>> CommandLinePicoContainer.java
>> Good question.  Is there anybody actually using the CommandLinePico  
>> right now,
>> or is it serving more as an example of operation?
>> If the former, then I'll definitely put a deprecated stub there, if  
>> latter, then
>> I'm all for just deleting the old class.
>
> I agree - let's see if deprecation is necessary.  Being the fix a  
> simple rename, I would opt for a simple note in the release notes.   
> But not against deprecation if you prefer.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email