Re: [picocontainer-dev] Visitor Work

I am ;-)

On Jun 21, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Michael Rimov wrote:

>
>> So its funny Aslak reworked the lifecycle stuff to use a visitor  
>> some years
> ago. I >ended up removing it and going back to essentially the  
> current design
> because >visitation thru a tree was going to go to every node  
> regardless of
> lifecycle strategy >choices for each node.  I.e. if you wanted to  
> block
> traversal at some scope, you >could not.  Seems to me that a  
> container should be
> able to block a number of things >its parent is trying to do to it.
>
> Yeah, I remember that stuff.
>
> If I have the time when Pico 3 rolls around, I'll see about  
> expanding from
> there.
>
> 						-Mike
>
> P.S. For any lurkers out there, no we aren't even really THINKING  
> about Pico 3
> yet! :)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email