Re: [picocontainer-dev] Visitor Work

And  Mike the testcase that shows use of ABORT_TRAVERSAL does not  
really explain why a person would use it.

What's the real world scenario ?

- Paul

On Jun 21, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Paul Hammant wrote:

> OK Mike, I can apply the patch (after two small manual applications  
> to two files) and it builds and passes tests.
>
> visitContainer(PicoContainer) returning true begs a question:
>
> "Any visitor callback that returns ABORT_TRAVERSAL indicates the  
> desire to abort any further traversal"
>
> Does that mean traversal just halts at the current visitation, or is  
> not allowed to go deeper than the current 'container depth' ?
>
> - Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email