Re: [picocontainer-dev] Visitor Work

Paul Hammant wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> So its funny Aslak reworked the lifecycle stuff to use a visitor some
> years ago. I ended up removing it and going back to essentially the
> current design because visitation thru a tree was going to go to every
> node regardless of lifecycle strategy choices for each node.  I.e. if
> you wanted to block traversal at some scope, you could not.  Seems to
> me that a container should be able to block a number of things its
> parent is trying to do to it.
> 
> So if you were interested there is in Svn (deleted) a LifecycleVisitor.

The main problem was stop/dispose, since they need a visitor visiting the
elements in reverse order ... ;-)

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email