Re: [picocontainer-dev] webapp-common jar
Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:17:15 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Hammant wrote:
> We have some five or so example webapps that demo WebWork or Struts
> permutations.
>
> The used to depend on a common jar that contained components common to all.
>
> The trouble is that newbie experiences mean that a person only has a
> short period of time to decide whether they like something or not, and
> having source in one place for a single webapp demo, makes a positive
> experience about 10x more likely.
>
> Thus I have copied the handful of classes to each example webapp in
> turn, even if that means code duplication.
We just need to make sure that there is no duplication of packages, so
that all examples can co-exist in same IDE classpath. It can ATM.
> Aside from the 10x experience factor, we could now move subtly in an
> idiomatically correct direction for each web framework.
On a separate point, why did you check into svn the demo warfiles?
I really don't the idea of checking *any* artifact in svn.
We can upload them to snapshot repo (or even make them versioned
releases) and then pull them down via dependency plugin when building
distribution.
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email