Re: [picocontainer-dev] 2.10 released, 3.0 to begin ?

Good idea.

I've rquested the git repo :)

- Paul

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Michael Rimov <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hey, if we’re gonna start working on 3, can we do a minor release of all
> the subcomponents pointing to Pico 2.10?  Would make things nice and clean
> J
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Hammant [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 22, 2010 12:03 PM
> *To:* dev-qxt/[email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [picocontainer-dev] 2.10 released, 3.0 to begin ?
>
>
>
>
>
>  > 5) try to get proxytoys bumped as a dep, or work out if
> > we're going full ASM (me)
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> On 5 - I recently stumbled upon cool mocking framework which
> works without proxytoys or asm, and can do a lof of amasing things
> like partial mocking,  ignore finals etc:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jmockit/
>
> Maybe there is a solution for this proxy problem (as this works perfectly
> and does what is necessary, I did not had a chance to look really deep
> inside)
>
>
> Mockito is the one I'm seeing used more recently. I'll checkout jmockit
>
>
> I also do some android development, and there is definitely need for
> really lightweight DI,   but even bare pico is too heavy.  Maybe there
> could be femtocontainer with just DI,  minimal set of adapters, no exetrnal
> dependencies and without scripting (JSON notation would be acceptable though
> )
>
>
> He he - go for it dude!
>
> - Paul
>