[picocontainer-dev] working again on PicoContainer passing the JSR-330 TCK
Paul Hammant <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Mar 2011 16:56:57 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Gang, I did some work on the JSR330 module. Principally dumbing it down to be JUnit 3.8.1 rather than JUnit4. It wants to live as an old fashioned test-suite so who am I to argue with it. There are two test classes - neither passes. Both leverage the test suite from JSR330 to show what has been injected incorrectly. - One, ManualInjectionJsr330TestCase, is an attempt to pass the TCK without a container - The other PicoContainerJsr330TestCase attempts the same with a PicoContainer doing the setup Anyway, it should be easy for anyone to jump into, if they feel inclined :) - Paul --0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div>Hi Gang,</div><div><br></div>I did some work on the JSR330 module. =A0= Principally dumbing it down to be JUnit 3.8.1 rather than JUnit4. =A0It wan= ts to live as an old fashioned test-suite so who am I to argue with it.<div= > <br></div><div>There are two test classes - neither passes. =A0Both leverag= e the test suite from JSR330 to show what has been injected incorrectly.</d= iv><div><ul><li>One, ManualInjectionJsr330TestCase, is an attempt to pass t= he TCK without a container</li> <li>The other=A0PicoContainerJsr330TestCase attempts the same with a PicoCo= ntainer doing the setup</li></ul><div>Anyway, it should be easy for anyone = to jump into, if they feel inclined :)</div></div><div><br></div><div>- Pau= l</div> --0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38--