[picocontainer-dev] working again on PicoContainer passing the JSR-330 TCK

Paul Hammant <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Mar 2011 16:56:57 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Gang,

I did some work on the JSR330 module.  Principally dumbing it down to be
JUnit 3.8.1 rather than JUnit4.  It wants to live as an old fashioned
test-suite so who am I to argue with it.

There are two test classes - neither passes.  Both leverage the test suite
from JSR330 to show what has been injected incorrectly.

   - One, ManualInjectionJsr330TestCase, is an attempt to pass the TCK
   without a container
   - The other PicoContainerJsr330TestCase attempts the same with a
   PicoContainer doing the setup

Anyway, it should be easy for anyone to jump into, if they feel inclined :)

- Paul

--0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>Hi Gang,</div><div><br></div>I did some work on the JSR330 module. =A0=
Principally dumbing it down to be JUnit 3.8.1 rather than JUnit4. =A0It wan=
ts to live as an old fashioned test-suite so who am I to argue with it.<div=
>
<br></div><div>There are two test classes - neither passes. =A0Both leverag=
e the test suite from JSR330 to show what has been injected incorrectly.</d=
iv><div><ul><li>One, ManualInjectionJsr330TestCase, is an attempt to pass t=
he TCK without a container</li>
<li>The other=A0PicoContainerJsr330TestCase attempts the same with a PicoCo=
ntainer doing the setup</li></ul><div>Anyway, it should be easy for anyone =
to jump into, if they feel inclined :)</div></div><div><br></div><div>- Pau=
l</div>

--0016367b6cc8cf76a7049dd84b38--