Re: CVS: plexus-components/jetty/src/java/org/apache/plexus/jetty JettyAdvancedContainer.java,NONE,1.1

well, I brought it up in #plexus. We could have just one... or we could 
have two!  Twice the fun and excitement.  I guess the reason for two is 
so people don't have to go change their configs.

Also, I don't think it can extend the standard container, but they could 
definitely have the same base class.  I don't think its worth the time 
to refactor.  If you don't like it I'll knock it down to just the more 
advanced jetty component.

- Dan

Jason van Zyl wrote:

>On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:28, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>  
>
>>Update of /cvsroot/plexus/plexus-components/jetty/src/java/org/apache/plexus/jetty
>>In directory eng.werken.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6444/jetty/src/java/org/apache/plexus/jetty
>>
>>Added Files:
>>	JettyAdvancedContainer.java 
>>Log Message:
>>Add AJP and multiple host support via a new ServletContainer
>>implementation. Let me know thoughts/opinions.  An example config
>>is below:
>>
>>      <configuration>
>>        <listeners>
>>          <ajp13>
>>            <host>127.0.0.1</host>
>>            <port>8009</port>
>>          </ajp13>
>>          <socket>
>>            <host>*</host>
>>            <port>8080</port>
>>          </socket>
>>        </listeners>
>>        <webappsDirectory>${plexus.home}/web-apps</webappsDirectory>
>>        <extractWars>true</extractWars>
>>      </configuration>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Why doesn't this extend the standard container, or why do we need two?
>
>  
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
http://junktoast.com