Re: Food Tasting, Memory and Rolling Back Transactions.
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ross Rick<[email protected]> wrote: > So yes, I am ok with keeping the model safe from deterministic > errors. My concern is an error beyond my control after the model has > been modified in the transaction. As I understand it Prevayler will > not set the model back to the state it was in before the transaction > started. I can't imagine how it could. And now reading this I > understand that this is independent of food tasting. Of course, the > transaction will not be serialized to disk so I can reload the model > to the correct state. Since we are in an exception state I would be > unlikely to be able to reverse the changes made to the model anyway, > so a reload is really required in all cases. The transaction *is* serialized to disk. Transactions are written to the journal before being executed. Cheers, Justin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org