Re: Prevayler vs Terracotta

Prevayler does require you to hold all your objects in the JVM heap in
RAM. If you cannot do that, as you know, you cannot use Prevayler.

A prevalent system can be set up for mirroring (replicas of your
system 100% in sync), so you can do fault-tolerance and load
balancing.

Each replicating machine must be capable of keeping all your objects in RAM.

See you, Klaus.



On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Sergey Didenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question for guys familiar with Terracotta:
>
> Under what conditions Prevayler can suit needs better than Terracotta
> with its DSO?
>
> I have found this reply from a Terracotta engineer so far -
> http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/89.page
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org