Re: Prevayler vs Terracotta
Sergey Didenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I know, Klaus, I'm looking for answers more like " Prevayler is better for rapid prototyping if you can afford storing all your DB in memory (or writing ad-hoc paging system). Because you can just copy your transaction log on your local machine and play with it. " I don't know Terracotta enough though, it's just to explain my question. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> wrote: > Prevayler does require you to hold all your objects in the JVM heap in > RAM. If you cannot do that, as you know, you cannot use Prevayler. > > A prevalent system can be set up for mirroring (replicas of your > system 100% in sync), so you can do fault-tolerance and load > balancing. > > Each replicating machine must be capable of keeping all your objects in RAM. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org