Re: Future of Prevayler?
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> A built in serialization with AVRO (http://hadoop.apache.org/avro/) Interesting. > Journal and Snapshot cleanup/management I agree. > A mechanism for arbitrary transactions ( startTx(), endTx() ) Questionable benefits and doable only with heavy code instrumentation. > A long term strategy for passivation of object graph sections Also requires heavy instrumentation and opens the OODBMS can of worms. I dont know if a switchable Prevayler<->OODBMS system makes sense. It might. See you, Klaus. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org