Re: Replication
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]>wrote: > Dennis, I would go to 2.3 and work on it if you need. > Yeah, we were actually pretty careful to keep things backwards-compatible, so upgrading to 2.3 is not a bad idea. The slaves wait for the master to sync transactions, but I am pretty > sure the master does not wait for the slaves. Anyway, if it does wait, > that can be easily changed. > Yes, I believe that's right. The master just sticks each transaction on a queue for each replica, to be sent asynchronously. Cheers, Justin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org