Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAshuuGGMpPWyykyRFUDJpoRAdpiiFsgQ=C0DR7yiSvKKMGpQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I added a couple of minor code review comments to the patch on GitHub. As before, I leave it to someone else to do the merge when satisfied. On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> wrote: > Done. > > On 7 November 2011 22:39, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> wrote: > > Deep copy. It is a general principle of Prevayler to default the safest > option. > > > > Klaus > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, and should transaction-deep-copy or direct be the default? > >> > >> On 7 November 2011 22:09, Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Instead of calling it > >>> prevaylerFactory.configureDeserializeThenExecute > >>> > >>> please call it > >>> prevaylerFactory.configureTransactionDeepCopy > >>> > >>> Thanks, Klaus > >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion > _______________________________________________ > "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org