Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...

Naveen Chawla <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.prevayler
Message-ID <CAGs7EcWc-NbDfehbdGUOFwVFK3W2pPKr_iVF+roBFneWCk5jJw@mail.gmail.com>
Looks possible via bytecode instrumentation even after the jvm has started:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/instrument/package-summary.html#package_description
http://www.csg.is.titech.ac.jp/~chiba/javassist/

> ...so you could seamlessly create and use terabyte+ sized Java objects with it!
>
> Stupid? Crazy? Pointless? Impossible? Maybe one day? Or already possible?
>
> Maybe by transparently allowing deserialization/serialization of
> fields to/from memory, based on which ones are most/least used. Or
> maybe there's an even simpler way.
>
> I'm guessing it'd still be way more performant than databases. I like
> the Prevayler "way" of doing things, so I wouldn't want the user code
> to change in any way, so it'd still be "Prevayler".
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.