Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGs7EcWc-NbDfehbdGUOFwVFK3W2pPKr_iVF+roBFneWCk5jJw@mail.gmail.com> |
Looks possible via bytecode instrumentation even after the jvm has started: http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/instrument/package-summary.html#package_description http://www.csg.is.titech.ac.jp/~chiba/javassist/ > ...so you could seamlessly create and use terabyte+ sized Java objects with it! > > Stupid? Crazy? Pointless? Impossible? Maybe one day? Or already possible? > > Maybe by transparently allowing deserialization/serialization of > fields to/from memory, based on which ones are most/least used. Or > maybe there's an even simpler way. > > I'm guessing it'd still be way more performant than databases. I like > the Prevayler "way" of doing things, so I wouldn't want the user code > to change in any way, so it'd still be "Prevayler". > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org