ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Since transaction filtering (atomicity) was removed I would have to say it's no longer correct to call Prevayler ACID-compliant. We should write something about this in the release notes of 2.6. Why people don't consider this to be a problem, perhaps include a bit of text about how failing transactions are stored to the journal and why that's a good idea. Anyone feel like summing that up in a paragraph or two? karl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org