ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6

Karl Wettin <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.prevayler
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Since transaction filtering (atomicity) was removed I would have to say it's no longer correct to call Prevayler ACID-compliant.

We should write something about this in the release notes of 2.6. Why people don't consider this to be a problem, perhaps include a bit of text about how failing transactions are stored to the journal and why that's a good idea.

Anyone feel like summing that up in a paragraph or two?


			karl



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org