Re: ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:58:32 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMAooZE+nk2XZLGKSYp2FbyyE5=sp2_wdN5NyWo4aOj4qmc4uw@mail.gmail.com> |
The FoodTaster does not protect us against infinite loops, deadlocks in the code, non-determinism, silent bugs, swallowed exceptions or exceptions in worker threads. How is adding protection against exceptions that leak suddenly atomic? To me it is an argument along a scale of consistency, not a true/false argument of atomicity. Otherwise, it seems, it would be impossible to write an atomic prevalence layer for any language that does not have exceptions, such as Assembly, Smalltalk-80 and ANSI-C. Klaus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org