Re: ACIDity of Prevayler 2.6
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:59:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAshuuHTcQ+O1Wz+zkh1XQGTV56sdfg+7qpN3W=MD7irysJf1A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Dec 6, 2012 12:10 PM, "Karl Wettin" <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I think this discussion is a bit out of scope for this thread, i.e. > is Prevayler 2.6 ACIDic? And does it matter if it is? My answer to both > those questions, as you all might know by now, is no. If we look at ACIDity as a continuum, I'm arguing that Prevayler without rollbacks is still more ACIDic than most databases with rollbacks, since they don't have true serializable transactions, which is more important to me personally than rollbacks. That said, the most practical question for this thread is really: Should the food taster be restored for the next release? So far we've merely been rehashing why it was removed. :) As someone who is neither actively using nor actively contributing to Prevayler, I'm abstaining from that decision. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org