Re: Which version of Java should we Target?

:D

1.5 at least


On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Karl Wettin <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> 20 jan 2013 kl. 15:40 skrev Klaus Wuestefeld:
>
> Should we keep backward compatibility with Java 1.4? Or can we use
> generics internally?
>
> Which version of Java should we target? 1.5? 1.6? 1.7?
>
>
> We talked about this before and it was fun : )
>
> I can see the use for 1.4 as it would allow for embedded devices that
> use JamVM, SableVM, etc. But I also feel that if you run Java on such
> architecture and consider Prevayler, then you're probably well versed
> enough to recompile and target 1.4.
>
> My vote is 1.6. @Override.
>
>
>
> karl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
> MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe go to the end of this page:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org