Re: JournalDiskSyncStrategy?

Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:01:22 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.prevayler
Message-ID <CAMAooZGB30bykrHRaUs7=ytPWNgr9DJLv5uBWYvUzkh_0ySvsQ@mail.gmail.com>
200 transactions with sync: 7 seconds.
200 transactions without sync: 3 millis.
One big transaction: ?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Wettin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 21:53, Justin Sampson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Since you're not actually wanting to turn off disk sync, just
> make it more efficient, one of these options might be preferable
> to making the disk sync logic itself more configurable.
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm afraid they're not applicable for my
> case due to the transactions being interdependent on each other, e.g. I
> might not have enough information to produce my second transaction unless
> the first already has been executed. This syncronized singleton delta
> evaluator of mine is all about fixing isolation.
>
>
> karl
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe go to the end of this page:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org
>



-- 
Valeu, Klaus.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion
_______________________________________________
"Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org