Re: JournalDiskSyncStrategy?
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:01:22 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.prevayler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMAooZGB30bykrHRaUs7=ytPWNgr9DJLv5uBWYvUzkh_0ySvsQ@mail.gmail.com> |
200 transactions with sync: 7 seconds. 200 transactions without sync: 3 millis. One big transaction: ? On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Wettin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 21:53, Justin Sampson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since you're not actually wanting to turn off disk sync, just > make it more efficient, one of these options might be preferable > to making the disk sync logic itself more configurable. > > > Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm afraid they're not applicable for my > case due to the transactions being interdependent on each other, e.g. I > might not have enough information to produce my second transaction unless > the first already has been executed. This syncronized singleton delta > evaluator of mine is all about fixing isolation. > > > karl > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion > _______________________________________________ > "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org > -- Valeu, Klaus. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion _______________________________________________ "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org