Re: 500 error when inviting new blog admin
Rich Bowen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.roller.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <pony-6f3336ac3b851b1f9c66944c71ee4af43129bf71-df2163a51f049e37b8add76bfb489db2cc428cc4@dev.roller.apache.org> |
Um ... sorry ... my mistake, the second invite immediately after the first *did* result in a 500 this time, but this time for a different reason:
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/activation/DataSource
at org.apache.roller.weblogger.util.MailUtil.sendMessage(MailUtil.java:577) ~[classes/:?]
However, that appears to be a configuration problem - ie, no mail server designated. So probably unrelated.
On 2021/03/17 15:54:41, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> I have just added some people to the Conferences section of blogs.apache.org, as authors. Each time, the server returns a 500 error, but the user is successfully added.
>
> The error message, which is extremely lengthy, starts with:
>
> 15:45:43.850 [http-nio-8080-exec-747] ERROR org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.DefaultDispatcherErrorHandler - Exception occurred during processing request: Method "save" failed for object org.apache.roller.weblogger.ui.struts2.editor.MembersInvite@51d2271
> ognl.MethodFailedException: Method "save" failed for object org.apache.roller.weblogger.ui.struts2.editor.MembersInvite@51d2271
> at ognl.OgnlRuntime.callAppropriateMethod(OgnlRuntime.java:1932) ~[ognl-3.1.26.jar:?]
> at ognl.ObjectMethodAccessor.callMethod(ObjectMethodAccessor.java:68) ~[ognl-3.1.26.jar:?]
> at com.opensymphony.xwork2.ognl.accessor.XWorkMethodAccessor.callMethodWithDebugInfo(XWorkMethodAccessor.java:98) ~[struts2-core-2.5.22.jar:2.5.22]
>
>
> This is apparently caused by ...
>
>
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.activation.DataSource
>
>
> Infra can provide the whole error message if that would be at all helpful.
>
> This appears to happen when the server has been idle for a very long time. ie, if I invite someone, this happens, but if I do a second one right away, I do not get the 500 error. Trying again the next morning, I get the 500 error again. This seems to suggest some kind of data connection timeout?
>
> Anyways, thanks, as always, for a great tool, and let me know if I can provide any further information.
>
>