Re: Maven port to current version 3

Hi Mick,

we will check this and come back [SCB3101]

regards
Frank

Am 06.05.2012 08:49, schrieb Mick Semb Wever:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:49 +0200, Hussayn Dabbous wrote:
>> I have already expressed
>> some doubts in the thread. I pointed out that ant is used not only for
>> building but also during runtime and i have not checked if you got that
>> addressed
>> with your changes.
>>
>> So now i have to ask the question how you can remove working functionality
>> without getting approval first. I thought we had started the process of
>> discussion, but you just went ahead without waiting for the decisions.
>> It would have been fair at least to ask back if all project owners
>> approve the change.
> While silence can often be considered as agreement in open source, i'm
> agreeing with Hussayn here. This change was done hastily and without
> proper regard to Hussayn's comments earlier in the thread.
> There was no further investigation into where ant was used during
> runtime. Such a change should have seeked more agreement on the list.
>
> Can we continue to follow this up? Is it the import actions that might
> have been broken by ant being removed?
>
> ~mck
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://scarab.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=455&dsMessageId=2958819

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].