Re: I'm Back

My idea is making long-terms improvements sequentaly:
1. Port to turbine 2.4. This remove Torque dependency and makes possible to use authenticated XML-RPC server, to define External API
2. Create and define XML-RPC API
3. Improve search capabilities
4. Possibly change ORM engine
5. Possibly change web-framework
And so on.

I Think now we can't to completely rewrite Scarab, it's to difficult, but moving step by step we can resolve some past mistakes.
If talking about separating business logic, I can resume what now business logic too tight integrated with web-framework components. And it decoupling can't be done in one moment.
But general movement should begin from stabilizing and organizing of application architecture. There are to many code which need a peer review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ларионов Андрей [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: I'm Back
> 
> Hello, all.
> I'm just finished my diploma and want to continue develop of Scarab.
> There are some mine minds on it in blog article http://digital-
> grail.blogspot.com/2008/02/scarab-should-survive.html. That all are not
> absolutely necessary. This is my vision of main 1.0 features. But there is
> a 0.22 release.
> I want to ask all developers:
> Should I take some problems on 0.22 or there is will be people who finish
> this work? Now make more then 50% of work on porting scarab to Turbine 2.4
> and I want to continue. But I can do a contribute to 0.22 to speed up
> release.
> 
> What I should do?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]