Re: Unified appearance of Comments-tab and History-tab

I only think of the comments you can write on each change. When these 
comments have more then 50 chars or something, it doesn't look good I think.

Mick Semb Wever schrieb:
>> But the history table looks better in my opinion with only one column.
>> I like this, when there are not so many columns where all information is
>> stuffed in. Some history entries weren't readable.
>>     
>
> Maybe. I can understand the sentiment that the old history table was 
> often too cluttered. Ronny did improve that separately in the same commit.
>
> I find that this isn't a page that i read verbosely (unlike the comments 
> tab). 
> Rather it's a page that i'm looking for one particular change via author 
> or datestamp and the history/comment associated with it. That is i'm 
> cross-relating the fields in the changes. For this reason to have the 
> various fields separated in columns allows the eye to scan and find 
> quicker.
>
> ~mck
>
>