Re: Turbine Port 2.4

I'm sorry but i loose this battle.
I spent nuch time to port Scarab from fulcrum-security to
turbine-security. But no success. It was compiled but dosn't work.
I start thinking on fulcrum-security JPA realization but changes in my
life stole all my time.
I read book about JPA, and want to realize but...

My conclusion about Turbine 2.4: It not ready for production. It not
maintained. Many hidden bugs and caveats.

Also i change my work and my life and have no time in near future (3-6
month). if You interested i can send you my last revision.

Also i thinking about full rewrite. Scarab has many good ideas in
core, but also too many problems in realisation. It make it less
maintainable.

I'm sorry for my fail, but i hope what can continue in future.

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:38, Johannes Hoechstaedter
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrej,
>
> do you still working for the Turbine port 2.4? What's your oppinion, is it
> still worthy to consider it? Do you need help?
>
> Johannes
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>