Issue #SCB2738 () Addon Wiki features
Hussayn Dabbous <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:34:00 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.scarab.issues |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Activity report on *Enhancement SCB2738 - Addon Wiki features* Scarab Link: http://www.solitone.org/scarab/issues/id/SCB2738 Module: Scarab Activity generated by Hussayn Dabbous ([email protected]) at 12/19/2008 19:28 *Reasons for the changes* *Comments* - By Hussayn Dabbous - 12/19/2008 19:28 --- "The main reason i was thinking about adding wiki featiures to Scarab was: 1.) We have radeox ready at hand 2.) we have implemented a very limited subset of wiki features (as poitned out in my first comment below) I myself am constantly toggling between opening up what we have (towards a full blown wiki) and doing some integration with an wiki (creating an API...) So maybe it will end as it ended with the workflow engine... We implementing a limited "example". I am not sure if we have a full API for workflow engine integration... Do we ? But the "simple implementation" seems to be powerfull and sufficient ? Or is the benefit, that it is "simply available for free (no additional integration work to be done) ??? The same may be true for Wiki features. We dont have an API, but we dont have a wiki either. We have something in between... Adding more wiki featrues sounds bad, but would help a lot for enhanced information ... Yes, Scarab is not a wiki... And it should never become a wiki with issue tracking featrues ;-) As it is its inconvenient. So where to go ? Adding a generic API would be a nice and ... flexible option. But then the next decision... Which wiki to integrate first ? I cant tell... I am very concerned about this. and its implications... What is it what we are doing here ? HELP!!! I feel like loosing control over Scarab ;-) " ------------------------------------------------------ http://scarab.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=458&dsMessageId=987704 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].