Re: Two questions

On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:32:10AM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 19:53 -0400, Laurie Harper wrote:
> > On 15-Jul-05, at 6:23 PM, Steven J. Owens wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:45:05PM -0400, Laurie Harper wrote:
> > >> 1) is the project still actively being maintained?
> > >      Yes... for some value of "active" :-).
> > 
> > That's what I was afraid of ;-)
> 
> The project may be lacking in documentation but the code is production
> class. We've been using it for the last three years. 
> 
> There might be features lacking, but it's no worse than posting a patch.

     I certainly didn't criticize the quality of the code.  (If I had
problems with it, we wouldn't be using it).  It could use some better
docs (which, as I said, I'll take a crack at sometime RSN).  It'd be
comforting if either the creator/maintainer, or somebody who's in
close/regular contact with the creator/maintainer, would speak up a
bit more often than once every six months, but that's life.

-- 
Steven J. Owens
[email protected] / (412) 401-8060 cell / (412) 578-9817 house
| "I'm going to make broad, sweeping generalizations and strong,
|  declarative statements, because otherwise I'll be here all night and
|  this document will be four times longer and much less fun to read.
|  Take it all with a grain of salt." 
|  - http://darksleep.com/notablog


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click