Re: What you get is what you want

Jean Rodrigues wrote:
 > I had a problem similar to what you explained with seda but I solved
 > it by avoiding blocking stuff.
 > But an Asynchronous Completion Token implementation should do
 > something similar, shouldn't it?

An "Asynchronous Completion Token" like java.util.concurrent.Future?  I 
don't know how the use of Future could resolve our backpressure problem, 
but I would be interested to ear you on that subject.

Regards,
Jean M


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8