Re: Project source structure

Quartz wrote:
> Please tag the CVS clearly and/or branch.
> As for users, they will want a clear version tracking.
 >
> (version of july 2002 was tagged. You might want to branch from there, not the head. Otherwise,
> tag the current head, and branch your stuff).

I think that we should continue the development from the head and not 
create a branch because:
1) the original version is already tagged seda-release-20020712;
2) I think that the head is for regular enhancements and the branch is 
for bug fixes and minor enhancements on the last release.

We want to enhance seda, not write bug fixes.  Thus, it seems better to 
continue in the main trunk (head).  Do you agree with this?

I'm not an expert in CVS best practices, so I could be wrong.

Regards,
Jean M




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8