Re: parameter config is a mess
Matthias Radestock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | LShift Ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott Miller wrote: > Ah, so the issue is that the parameter's defaults aren't changeable? Correct. I suppose we could add a set-parameter-default! procedure. The more difficult challenge is to figure out how to deal with all the "special" parameters, i.e. parameters that aren't straightforward dynamic Parameters. On that list we have: minprecision maxprecision permitinterrupts strictr5rs emitannotations emit-debugging-symbols home slib stack-trace-on-error We should turn as many of these as possible into straightforward dynamic parameters. Failing that, special dynamic parameters (i.e. entries directly handled by DynamicEnvironment). Failing that, AppContext scope. Failing that, global scope (i.e. static members of some class). matthias. PS: we should also use the opportunity to harmonize the naming scheme for config parameters. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com