Re: bug in BinaryDeserializer?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 09:24:57AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > Is this a bug in the (de)serialization code or is this behaviour expected?
> 
> As you say, ordinarily the deserialization methods don't need to look at 
> the contents of a deserialized object right away.  This is an exception, 
> so it suggests we need a way to specify that we need the object fully 
> initialized during deserialization, (and thus we need to serialize it so 
> that can happen).  Since its a JavaObject, we probably actually want the 
> ser/deser methods or the contract of JavaObject to hint to the 
> serialization that this needs to be enforced.
> 
Actually, I take that back, it should be done from the hashtable, say 
with a read/writeInitializedExpression or something.

	Scott



--
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+rUH9r9IW4v3mHtQRAiz9AJ9XyP5wdbdNAkBuE3qWy0uL2dfDUgCfTUxy
K1ALhGLBnrN8me3yYEg3FYs=
=wABi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.