Re: [[email protected]: Re: [[email protected]: bug in psyntax?]]

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:37:03PM +0100, Matthias Radestock wrote:
> 
> >I brought this up at the informal implementors workshop several years back
> >(1998), and there was general agreement that R5RS has it wrong.  If you
> >want to adhere to the R5RS version, however, it should be sufficient to to
> >remove the local-syntax-case from chi-top, chi-external, and chi-internal,
> >and modify chi-local-syntax to call chi-body.
> >
> >Kent
> 
> I can certainly see why the current behaviour is useful and more general 
> than that specified by R5RS, so it would be silly to remove it.
> 
> However, it would be nice to have a config parameter that allows us to 
> toggle strict R5RS compliance in this area.

We do: strict-r5rs-compliant.  Granted the expander behavior sited isn't 
wired into it at the moment, but it could be.

	Scott

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+suslr9IW4v3mHtQRAit2AJ9bWXWPAl/odE/eUOn7XsnNEdRVxQCeOutY
iftGgoSEHWgZmSK4EdVtxKI=
=Hmv7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----