Re: feature request from r5rs

Matthias Radestock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Narang wrote:
> 1st caveat I agree with but the other two caveats are also true for
> 
> (+ (force (delay (* 3 7)) 13)      ===> 34

yes, but they can be resolved with no / very little effort, which may 
not be the case for implicit forcing.


Matthias.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.