Re: SISC in applets

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:12:44PM -0700, Turadg Aleahmad wrote:
> 
> No, nor would they necessarily be in an applet.  It's an extra feature 
> that no one is obligated to utilize, and thus it is still "up to the 
> programmer".
> 
> It's not so much an issue of how SISC works as the build system. And the 
> build system already *does* create the heap and name it "sisc.shp".  
> Sticking it in a JAR too is useful and something appropriate for a build 
> script to do, optionally mind you.  And if it's in a JAR, it's going to 
> be "available as a resource".  And given that, it's useful for it to 
> have a reliable location, eg. "under sisc/boot".
> 
> None of the additions I've made or suggested require changing any 
> existing or future code.  They're just extra features.  I would put them 
> in contrib/ but I think that would be too hairy and I don't see that 
> they interfere with anything in the SISC main tree.
> 
> Yes/no?

I still like the idea.  It only complicates the source tree, and not in 
a painful way.  The benefit, to people embedding SISC, is pretty high, 
as it lets them avoid having to figure out how to handle the heap.

	Scott
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/BJFBr9IW4v3mHtQRAhyiAJ9e3ePdkH5g+0ssetg1CeWvnmXWIgCfVLj2
iMNr3xxs/F4qnbOIcHsq1ho=
=h9z2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.