Re: [ sisc-Feature Requests-783336 ] include docs in distribution

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:26:30AM +0100, Matthias Radestock wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> 
> >I'd prefer to just maintain a docs link on the website for each 
> >active version, and perhaps add a docs package to sf where we can 
> >archive them for each release.
> 
> I am mostly ok with that, although I think we should consider adding the 
> html docs (weighing in at 113k) to the full distribution - we are likely 
> to annoy/lose more users by not including docs than we do by adding a 
> few seconds to their download time.
I suppose that does make the most sense.

> Also, can we remove some of the older releases from sf? The download 
> list is getting really really long.

I don't know, but I'll look into it.

	Scott
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/MQIAr9IW4v3mHtQRAnOeAJ9T/e0dwfDZv/j8BjF6vkd60S6Y5wCfUftt
CyWJO09XnUNVcnnJMqcM+F0=
=OW+c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.