Re: [Fwd: Re: define-values implementation wanted for SISC / Chez Scheme / syntax-case]
"Scott G. Miller" <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:17:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:57:11PM +0000, Matthias Radestock wrote: > Matthias Radestock wrote: > > >The attached c.l.s posts illustrates a neat trick of using psyntax > >modules to splice a mixture of definitions and expressions into any > >context. > > > >I think we may be able to use this technique to simplify some of the > >macros in the records implementation, oo system and s2j, and make them > >better behaved when used in local contexts. > > Plus, obviously, we can at long last implement define-values! > Yeah, I thought you'd missed that for a second. :)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBtQSrr9IW4v3mHtQRAhi4AKCR5sCdF9zADSi7tae9AjEkw6OMqgCglCRy iMXmbrADjZjmuE40UAm/bts= =c4Zd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----