Re: proper stack traces

On 3/15/06, Matt Hellige <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
> I would find this extremely useful. Relatively weak error messages are
> one of the only problems I have with SISC. I don't have any specific
> examples, although I noticed a bug opened recently that captures a few
> of the common cases (where call info seems to be lost inside of "let"
> and perhaps other forms). Anyway, yes I'd love to see traces like
> these.

I would also find this extremely useful.  I'm learning Scheme using
SISC and the first days were a challenge: I had no idea what I was
doing, and the error messages didn't help much!

Best Regards,

Victor Rodriguez.

> Thanks...
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt Hellige                  [email protected]
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> SISC-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisc-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642