Re: Suggested correction to sisc/libs/srfi/srfi-8.scm

Ben Goetter <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:46:20 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============7873351072878065038==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------070108050505030607070604"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070108050505030607070604
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Indeed, updating to the r1_16_6 branch fixed it.  Sorry for the noise.


On 3/11/2010 12:26 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> I believe there are fixes in 1.16's tag that aren't merged forward 
> into HEAD.  This is one of them.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ben Goetter <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Yes, I'm using HEAD.  That's picking up a 1.3 revision srfi-8.scm
>     dated 2 Nov 2009 8:34AM sgmille  +27 -4  "Changed the license"
>
>     On 3/11/2010 12:17 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:
>>     Are you using CVS HEAD?
>>
>>     On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ben Goetter <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Oddly, when I "cvs update" I get this file at 1.3.  There's
>>         some weird branching going on there, according to history on
>>         the file.
>>
>>         On 3/11/2010 12:06 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:
>>
>>             Actually, I show srfi-8 already doing that.  The code on
>>             the 1.16 tag is:
>>
>>

--------------070108050505030607070604
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Indeed, updating to the r1_16_6 branch fixed it.&nbsp; Sorry for the noise.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/11/2010 12:26 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:
<blockquote
 cite="mid:[email protected]"
 type="cite">I believe there are fixes in 1.16's tag that aren't merged
forward into HEAD.&nbsp; This is one of them.<br>
  <br>
  <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ben Goetter
  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
 href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span>
wrote:<br>
  <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
 style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
    <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Yes, I'm using HEAD.&nbsp; That's picking up a 1.3 revision srfi-8.scm dated
2 Nov 2009 8:34AM sgmille&nbsp; +27 -4&nbsp; "Changed the license"
    <div>
    <div class="h5"><br>
On 3/11/2010 12:17 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:
    <blockquote type="cite">Are you using CVS HEAD?<br>
      <br>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ben Goetter <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
 moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span>
wrote:<br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
      <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
 style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Oddly,
when
I "cvs update" I get this file at 1.3. &nbsp;There's some weird
branching going on there, according to history on the file.
        <div>
        <div><br>
On 3/11/2010 12:06 PM, Scott G. Miller wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
 style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Actually,
I show srfi-8 already doing that. &nbsp;The code on the 1.16 tag
is:<br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
  </blockquote>
  </div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------070108050505030607070604--


--===============7873351072878065038==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--===============7873351072878065038==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
SISC-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisc-devel

--===============7873351072878065038==--